DoorDash
The firm denies it created the mass arbitration guidelines, but said it was right to work with the arbitration organization on its DoorDash cases.
December 19, 2019 at 06:37 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher denied allegations it helped draft new mass arbitration rules for an arbitration venue related to thousands of DoorDash couriers, and accused opposing counsel of failing to properly vet plaintiffs in a filing Thursday.
Chicago plaintiffs firm Keller Lenkner is seeking to compel individual arbitration for more than 6,000 DoorDash contractors in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Phila. Jury Hands Up $6.1M Verdict to Crushed Worker Despite Plaintiff's 'Nuclear' Settlement Demand
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
