Global Arbitration Lawyers Flock to Saudi Arabian Conference Amidst Boycott
As "Davos in the Desert" dries up due to the controversy surrounding Jamal Khashoggi, international arbitration lawyers from around the world were scheduled to rub elbows with Saudi leadership at another conference down the road.
October 16, 2018 at 04:53 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Thanks to their decision to stay home, JPMorgan Chase's Jamie Dimon, Blackstone's Steve Schwarzman and BlackRock's Larry Fink have helped to make the Saudi government's so-called Davos in the Desert investment conference a household name.
Responding to the alleged murder of Saudi Arabian journalist Jamal Khashoggi, the CEOs and other media and tech luminaries announced they would not participate in next week's Future Investment Initiative in Riyadh.
But the Saudi Center of International Arbitration's first international conference—which featured a handful of arbitration leaders at top international firms along with members of the Saudi cabinet—managed to fly under the radar just down the road.
The timing of the event meant that lawyers from King & Spalding, Norton Rose Fulbright, White & Case and other firms, along with leadership from the American Arbitration Association, were scheduled to brush shoulders in Riyadh on Monday and Tuesday with a member of the Saudi royal family and multiple cabinet officials while questions swirled about whether Saudi agents had been sent to Turkey to kill and dismember the Washington Post columnist.
The list of speakers included Prince Dr. Abdulaziz bin Sattam al Saud, and the Saudi ministers of Labor and Social Development, Justice, and Commerce & Investment. They were to be joined by a list of arbitration experts from around the world including UAE-based King & Spalding partner Adrian Cole, Norton Rose Fulbright international arbitration global co-head Mark Baker, and White & Case international arbitration head Paul Friedland.
“It was an honor to speak on the topic of cross examination at the Saudi Center of Commercial Arbitration's first international conference,” Baker said in an email. “This important conference on international arbitration and mediation was attended by more than 750 ministers, academics and lawyers.”
Representatives of King & Spalding and White & Case did not respond to inquiries about whether their attorneys ultimately participated.
The list also featured AAA CEO India Johnson and general counsel Eric Tuchmann. An AAA representative also did not respond to an inquiry about their participation.
King & Spalding, Norton Rose Fulbright and White & Case are all among a short list of U.S.-based firms with substantial ties to Saudi Arabia. Saudi rules prevent international law firms from operating in the country without a local partner firm. King & Spalding's alliance dates to 2006, and Norton Rose Fulbright has been there since 2005. White & Case, which handles significant work for state-owned Saudi Aramco, arrived in 1989.
More recently, Mayer Brown and Hogan Lovells announced tie-ups in the country earlier this year.
Hogan Lovells is one of several U.S. firms that have also done U.S. lobbying work for Saudi Arabia in the last year. In June, senior counsel Norm Coleman, the former Minnesota Republican senator, signed an agreement with a $125,000 monthly retainer for the entirety of 2018.
In August, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partner Theodore Olson agreed to put in time, including the preparation of an op-ed, opposing the proposed “No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act” for a flat fee of $250,000. The bill, which was introduced this year in the U.S. House of Representatives, would expose OPEC to U.S. prosecution for any antitrust violations.
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck also has an open lobbying relationship with the Kingdom, extending through the end of 2018, also at $125,000 monthly.
Representatives from all three firms did not respond to requests for comment.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Kirkland Fends Off Antitrust Claims for Thomson Reuters Against AI-Backed Start-Up
How Senior Litigators Are Dealing With the 'Biden Effect'
'Clear the Runway': Bill Lee's Longtime Focus on Succession Planning
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5Partner Cuts: The Grim Reality of Post-Merger Integration
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250