Since the demise of Enron in thewinter of 2001, prosecutorsaround the country have devotedmuch attention to white-collarinvestigations and prosecutions. Andwith the advent of these sophisticatedwhite-collar investigations, as well as therapid demise of Arthur Andersen,much attention also has been paid by companiesand their counsel to documentretention policies — what should be saved,how it should be saved and when it shouldbe saved.
Less attention has been devoted to theproduction of documents in such cases.A gap often exists between the expectationsof the government and corporationswhen it comes to document production.Failure to understand the world views ofprosecutors and regulators can lead tocorporations making decisions they latermay regret.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
