It was a tale of two document reviews: Sidley Austin partner Robert Keeling said that in a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act case he once handled, a traditional “linear” review wasn’t yielding results. When he applied predictive coding, though, a pattern emerged: the suspects were using a special word when they talked about bribes.
A reference to “chocolate” meant cash, Keeling recalled during a panel event on Thursday about the future of electronic discovery.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
