If you think legal professionals are queasy about artificial intelligence (AI), then you should check out the formal request for information (RFI) issued by the government in June, which noted that, as with any “transformative technology,” AI “carries risks and presents complex policy challenges.”
As noted in TechCrunch this week, the RFI specified “topics to be addressed,” including AI’s potential for “abuse” or “public good.” Coming to the table for clarification was IBM, which described AI in terms potentially relieving to legal professionals, such as “augmented” rather than “artificial intelligence.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
