In the first half of our discussion on rolling collections, we outlined an overview of the typical collection and review process. We identified one of the common challenges of legal review, namely, what to do when some document review has taken place and more data must be added to the collection of documents. Should a separate project be created for the newly collected data or can the newly collected data simply be added to the ongoing review project? If the latter, how do you ensure a legally defensible review has taken place?
In Part 1, we ended with a discussion on how to determine if two data sets can be merged into one review project based on analysis of the statistical fingerprints of the data sets. Now we turn to the more pressing question: How do you determine if the existing training set will work effectively on the newly collected data.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
