The current pandemic is forcing many corporate legal departments (CLDs) to tighten their purse strings, but there’s a silver lining: The opportunity to give sourcing decisions a second look. Insourcing was already a trend; in-house legal department employment has tripled and many believe over 50% of legal work is now done in-house. Now, COVID has created a good time to re-evaluate insourcing/outsourcing decisions in ways that fit better with the new normal.

Based on talks I’ve had with legal ops directors, most of them don’t see further insourcing as a viable option, as they don’t have budget for additional headcount. However, insourcing doesn’t have to involve hiring more warm bodies, it can be accomplished by re-imagining processes and workflows. Even if it did require additional hires, studies say that legal insourcing can result in a reduction of around 41 to 60% in staffing costs. Thus, I am not convinced the resistance to insourcing is wholly financial. Rather, I suspect many organizations simply don’t want to change during an already-painful time.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]