AI: The Stand-Out Quotes from the Speakers
Legalweek experts, in their own words, describe the challenges and opportunities of the AI upsurge in the legal sector.
February 02, 2018 at 08:00 AM
3 minute read
If you couldn't tell, artificial intelligence (AI) was the craze at Legalweek 2018.
Almost a dozen educational panels discussed AI. More vendor booths than you can count hyped AI features. Some experts even integrated AI into their job titles.
If you attended the flagship legal tech conference in New York this week, you likely learned something about machine learning, deep learning or supervised learning. Below are snippets of the in-depth dialogue that occurred across the Legalweek educational sessions focusing on AI.
Explosion of AI
The fascination with AI at Legalweek was a topic by itself. Many panelists likened the AI buzz to the interest in technology assisted review (TAR) at Legaltech a few years back.
“This is the year of AI. Some people are even making a verb out of it. It's best to figure out what you are talking about before you go AI'ing it all up.” Farrah Pepper, Legaltech Advisory Board
“Why now? None of you cared about AI 15 years ago. It's the confluence of many things coming together… more data, more computing power, more tools.” Tonya Custis, Thomson Reuters Labs
“You have to have AI in your name or people will think you are irrelevant.” Martin Tully, Actuate Law
“The term AI can mean something different to everyone.” Christian Mahoney, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton
Legal Technology Adoption of AI
Software vendors are working to build AI capabilities into their platforms, mimicking human behaviors as closely as possible. AI-powered time-keeping, AI contract analysis, AI document review, AI legal research, AI brief writing—the sky is the limit for how AI will integrate into the legal market in the coming years.
“The goal is to collect information from a multiplicity of devices and sources, and only then can you start mining the intelligence.” Pallab Chakraborty, AI & Legal Technology Thought Leader
“AI within the legal research context is like a librarian's attempt to conduct a reference interview with the searcher. As you interact with the machine, it begins to learn and make research recommendations.” Don MacLeod, Debevoise & Plimpton
“The technology will be the prep cook for the chef who is the lawyer.” Martin Tully, Actual Law
Debunking AI Apprehension
The dangers of AI transcended every discussion, with some panelists expressing the view that AI may be a threat to our existence, and other panelists emphasizing that the legal industry needs to trust machines to find answers across disparate volumes of data.
“Data is the new oil. AI looks at connections in data that humans will never be able to tackle.” Bert Kaminski, GE Digital
“The law is not forgiving. If you make a mistake, you lose your opportunity to make an argument, and that fear is preventing people from adopting these emerging technologies.” Marla Crawford, Goldman Sachs
“We are teaching our students to work with these new tools, so their jobs are not replaced by technology.” Laura Norris, Santa Clara University School of Law
Michele C.S. Lange is a freelance writer and attorney based in Minneapolis, MN. She has more than 15 years of experience in the e-discovery industry and can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250