China: Keeping China's secrets
In the business community, we have seen continued deliberation as to whether the Rio Tinto decision has had any implications for the way in which foreign businesses conduct their negotiations in mainland China. The situation is far from clear, and the spectre of foreign regulators continues to loom large for commercial organisations. Added to this is the UK Bribery Act, which received Royal Assent on 8 April 2010 and is expected to come into force later this year. Together with the US Foreign and Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), these pieces of legislation have extra-territorial effect, such that regulatory authorities in the UK and US have powers to consider activities of businesses in China.
New rules in China have blurred the line between corporate and state secrets, meaning overseas companies must tread very carefully. Herbert Smith’s May Tai and Sarah Munro report
This premium content is reserved for
Legal Week Subscribers.
A PREMIUM SUBSCRIPTION PROVIDES:
- Trusted insight, news and analysis from the UK and across the globe
- Connections to senior business lawyers within the leading law firms and legal departments
- Unique access to ALM's unrivalled, market-leading reporting in the US and Asia and cutting-edge research, including Legal Week's UK Top 50 and Global 100 rankings
- The Legal Week Daily News Alert, Editor's Highlights, and Breaking News digital newsletters and more, plus a choice of over 70 ALM newsletters
- Optimized access on all of your devices: desktop, tablet and mobile
- Complete access to the site's full archive of more than 56,000 articles
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact Paul Reeves on Preeves@alm.com or call on +44 (0) 203 875 0651