Top in-house lawyers believe the recent Akzo Nobel judgment on privilege for corporate counsel has had a negative impact on their professional status, but corporate counsel concede that employed status limits independence. Michelle Madsen reports
October 24, 2007 at 08:05 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legalweek
Top in-house lawyers believe the recent Akzo Nobel judgment on privilege for corporate counsel has had a negative impact on their professional status, but corporate counsel concede that employed status limits independence. Michelle Madsen reports
One in four in-house lawyers feel like ‘second-class citizens’ as a result of a key European ruling on privilege for corporate counsel, according to a new poll.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
