Former Philadelphia Housing Authority Executive Director Carl Greene has lost his battle to stop potentially privileged legal bills from being turned over to HUD now that a federal circuit court ruled a PHA attorney’s word that there were no privileged invoice entries was good enough.
“Moreover, although Greene contends that the district court abused its discretion because it permitted review only by ‘parties with interests adverse to Mr. Greene’s,’ we rely constantly on parties with adverse interests to be honest in responding to discovery requests,” Judge Thomas I. Vanaskie of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said for the three-judge panel in the nonprecedential ruling in Greene v. PHA .
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
