Lateral thinking - why Slaughters has finally hired a partner after 125 years
Two remarkable things happened this morning: England beat Australia in a game of cricket and Slaughter and May hired a partner from another firm. Given such seismic events, it would be little surprise to see a pig in a bowler hat take to the skies over the Royal Exchange this afternoon.
January 24, 2014 at 08:57 AM
3 minute read
Two remarkable things happened this morning: England beat Australia in a game of cricket and Slaughter and May hired a partner from another firm.
Given such seismic events, it would be little surprise to see a pig in a bowler hat take to the skies over the Royal Exchange this afternoon.
Slaughters' decision to plunge into the lateral market to capture the signature of capital markets partner John Moore should not be read as a sign that the firm that has always been the poster child for organic growth is changing tack, so much as evidence for the growing importance of the Morrison & Foerster partner's practice area.
Moore is co-head of the US firm's Chinese capital markets practice, and, having worked in-house at Goldman Sachs and been chair of the Hong Kong Listing Committee, few in the city will have a better overview of the market.
So it's clear what Slaughters saw in Moore. But why was Hong Kong in January 2014 the time and place for the firm to buck 125 years of tradition and hire a lateral partner? The answer lies in the rapid growth of its US rivals in Hong Kong. "We have been looking at this for a little time now because there has been quite a sea change in the Hong Kong market," explains Paul Olney, Slaughters' practice partner. "A number of US law firms are not only increasing capacity [generally] but taking on a Hong Kong capacity."
For Slaughters, which has always relied on its famed best friends network to buddy up over deals that require non UK-law capacity, the bullishness of American firms such as Davis Polk & Wardwell and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett has forced it to adapt.
Olney continues: "What became clear in the partnership was that it's become increasingly difficult to keep teaming up with a US partner, particularly in Hong Kong capital markets. "It's a market that we have to be in and we felt we had to respond to that."
That's not to say the decision was taken lightly. Indeed, there was a full partner vote even to approve the strategy before any approach to Moore, who has been known to Slaughters partners including existing Hong Kong capital markets partner Benita Yu since his Goldman days.
Nor does it mean that the floodgates will open. "This is a new departure for us," Olney accepts. "There's no glossing over that. We never said we would not hire laterals. But is this going to lead to a whole spate of them? No absolutely not."
Nevertheless, no one in either London or Hong Kong is likely to see this news as anything other than a sign that the growing threat from US firms means City institutions such as Slaughters might have to rethink their strategies. Interesting times await.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for Hard-Line Approach to Region
BCLP Mulls Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Trending Stories
- 12nd Circuit Revives Connecticut Lawyers' Challenge to Anti-Discrimination Ethics Rule
- 2Decision of the Day: Firm, Founding Partner Disqualified from Probate Case Amid Investigation on Undue Influence Claim
- 3Federal Judge Grants FTC Motion Blocking Proposed Kroger-Albertsons Merger
- 4Florida Court Rules in Favor of Production Co. in Dispute Over Viral Documentary 'Died Suddenly'
- 5What We Learned From In-House Lawyers in 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250