Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
In the mid-1990s practitioners spent a number of years grappling with the issue of the appropriate discount rate to apply to multipliers in clinical negligence and personal injury cases.

Historically, a relatively loose application of the 4.5% rate had been applied by the courts. In July 1998, the House of Lords in Wells v Wells [1999] held that until the Lord Chancellor set a rate under section 1 of the Damages Act 1996, a guideline rate of return of 3% could be expected from the investment of a sum awarded as damages for future pecuniary loss in personal injury actions.

This premium content is reserved for
Law.com International Subscribers.


  • Customized news by region including UK, Asia, Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa, and North America
  • Cutting-edge research such as UK Top 100, China 45, and Asia 50
  • Get the inside track on the biggest breaking stories that delve deep into the issues behind the headlines
  • Comprehensive coverage of the dynamic legal market from people moves to the major international jurisdictions
  • Global view into how legal tech, business of law, in-house and regulatory environments are intersecting worldwide

Already a subscriber?


Law.com International Newsletters & Briefings

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

Sign up for an unlimited number of complementary newsletters, alerts, and International Briefings. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 American Lawyer Media International, LLC. All Rights Reserved.