Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
37 results for '* topic:"Class Actions"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2019-05-08
Practice Area: Class Actions | Cybersecurity
Industry: Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ralph N. Sianni, Andersen Sleater Sianni, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Janine Pollack, The Sultzer Law Group P.C., New York, NY; Daniel Tepper, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, NY; Ben Barnow and Erich P. Schork, Barnow and Assoc., P.C., Chicago, IL; Howard L. Longman and Melissa R. Emert, Stull, Stull & Brody, New York, NY; Charles E. Schaffer, Levin Sedran & Berman LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Jeffrey S. Goldenberg, Goldenberg Schneider, LPA, Cincinnati, OH; Gary Ma-son, Whitfield Bryson & Mason LLP, Washington, DC; Laurence D. King and David A. Straite, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP, New York, NY; John A. Yanchunis and Ryan McGee, Morgan & Morgan, Tampa, FL; Jean Sutton Martin, The Law Office of Jeane Sutton Martin PLLC, Wilmington, NC; Lynda J. Grant, The Grant Law Firm PLLC, New York, NY for plaintiff and pro-posed class.
for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Gregory T. Parks, Ezra D. Church and Kristin M. Hadgis, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Wilmington, DE and Philadelphia, PA for defendant.
Case Number: D68553
Both public and private interests favored the transfer of this class action proceeding to a federal district court in another state, where a similar action was already pending.
Publication Date: 2018-11-14
Practice Area: Class Actions | Securities Litigation
Industry: Automotive | Legal Services | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farnan of Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Phillip Kim of The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., New York, NY; Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer and David M. Sborz of Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Ira M. Press, David A. Bishop and Thomas E. Elrod of Kirby Mcinerney LLP, New York, NY; Jeffrey M. Gorris and Christopher P. Quinn of Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Danielle S. Myers of Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA; P. Bradford deLeeuw of Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A.; Naumon A. Amjed, Darren J. Check and Ryan T. Degnan of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA, attorneys for plaintiffs
for defendant: Samuel A. Nolen and Katharine L. Mowrey of Richards Layton & Finger, P.A.; Douglas P. Baumstein and Susan L. Grace of White & Case LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for defendants.
Case Number: D68351
Institutional investor with largest financial interest in putative securities fraud class action was entitled to presumption as lead plaintiff despite falling afoul of the 5-in-3 Rule due to the statutory preference for institutional investors serving as lead plaintiffs in securities class actions.
Publication Date: 2018-05-30
Practice Area: Class Actions | Mergers and Acquisitions | Securities Litigation
Industry: Energy
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael Hanrahan, Paul A. Fioravanti, Jr., Kevin H. Davenport, Samuel L. Closic, and Eric J. Juray, Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Marc A. Topaz, Lee D. Rudy, Eric L. Zagar, Michael C. Wagner, and Grant D. Goodhart, III, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA, attorneys for plaintiffs
for defendant: Rolin P. Bissel, James M. Yoch, Jr., and Benjamin M. Potts, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael C. Holmes, John C. Wander, Craig E. Zieminski, and Andrew E. Jackson, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Dallas, TX; David E. Ross and Benjamin Z. Grossberg, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; M. Scott Barnard, Michelle Reed, and Lauren E. York, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Dallas, TX, attorneys for defendants.
Case Number: D68160
Unitholders' complaint challenging private issuance of securities to insiders established unfairness of transaction, but did not warrant equitable relief cancelling the transaction where partnership was not injured by transaction.
Publication Date: 2018-05-09
Practice Area: Class Actions | Insurance Law
Industry: Health Care | Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard H. Cross, Jr., Christopher P. Simon, Cross & Simon, LLC, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for plaintiffs
for defendant: Paul A. Bradley, Maron Marvel Bradley Anderson & Tardy, LLC, Wilmington, DE; George M. Church, Miles & Stockbridge, PC, Baltimore, MD; Meloney Perry, Perry Law, PC, Dallas, TX, attorneys for defendant.
Case Number: D68135
Motion to dismiss putative class action denied where court could not definitively determine that plaintiffs could not establish damage calculation method that would predominate over proposed class.
Publication Date: 2018-03-28
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Johnston
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel C. Herr and Jack D. McInnes for plaintiffs and the putative class
for defendant: Elizabeth S. Fenton, Danielle N. Petaja, Matthew J. Hank and Helga P. Spencer for defendant.
Case Number: D68093
The choice-of-law provision in the parties employment contracts did not extend the reach of another states labor statutes where that states statutes and case law expressed an intent to narrowly limit their application.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2018-03-28
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Chemicals and Materials
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Vaughn
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Barbara H. Stratton, Jonathan S. Massey and Scott M. Hendler for plaintiffs
for defendant: Donald E. Reid, Michael L. Brem, James W. Semple, Boaz S. Morag, Timothy Jay Houseal, D. Ferguson McNeil, Lisa C. McLaughlin, Adam V. Orlacchio and Kelly E. Farnan for defendants.
Case Number: D68090
In its answer to a certified question in this class action matter, the Delaware Supreme Court concluded that a conditional dismissal did not stop class action tolling.
Publication Date: 2018-03-14
Practice Area: Class Actions | Intellectual Property
Industry: Consulting
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Sleet
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D68072
Enhancement multiplier on lodestar amount of attorneys fees and costs unnecessary where counsel billed industry-standard rates, and where delay in payment and outlay of costs was not so excessive as to warrant compensating counsel.
Publication Date: 2017-11-08
Practice Area: Class Actions | Corporate Governance | Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Francis J. Murphy, Jr., Jonathan L. Parshall, Laurence D. Paskowitz, Deborah R. Gross and Roy Jacobs for plaintiffs
for defendant: John C. Cordrey, George T. Conway III, Bradley R. Wilson and Jordan L. Pietzsch for M&T Bank de-fendants; Kevin R. Shannon, Tracy Richelle High and Christen M. Martosella for Hudson Bank de-fendants.
Case Number: D67929
Plaintiffs in a class action suit failed to demonstrate that a proxy statement issued in connection with a merger transaction was misleading. Motion to dismiss granted, without prejudice.
Publication Date: 2017-11-01
Practice Area: Class Actions | Insurance Law
Industry: Health Care | Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Jurden
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John S. Spadaro and John Sheehan Spadaro for plaintiff
for defendant: Sidney S. Liebesman, Lisa Zwally Brown, Jay Williams and Paula M. Ketcham for defendant.
Case Number: D67925
A purported class did not meet the requirements for certification because the reasonableness and necessity of the medical expenses at issue required a particularized assessment of each patients injuries, treatment and ex-penses.
Publication Date: 2017-08-09
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Retail
Court: Delaware Court of Chancery
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D67827
Plaintiffs' derivative claim was barred after a federal court in another state dismissed a similar derivative claim for failure to plead demand futility, but on remand, the Court of Chancery recomme
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read