Petra Mezzanine Fund, L.P. v. Willis, DeFAX Case No. D65237 (D.Del. Nov. 1, 2012) Andrews, J. (5 pages).
The alleged subsequent agreement relied upon by defendants’ in their breach of contract counterclaim was not a valid contract because it sought to modify the parties’ original contribution agreement but was not in writing, as required. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss counterclaim granted in part.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
