An argument before the Delaware Supreme Court got technical on Wednesday when attorneys disagreed on when corporate law allows a vote by usually non-voting Fox Corp. and Snap Inc. shareholders.

Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann partner Edward Timlin argued for the shareholders that the Court of Chancery should have seen differences between the cases on appeal and those in the past that also brought up DGCL Section 242(b)(2), while Brad Sorrels, a partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, said shareholder powers apply the same way in each of those cases.