• In Re Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. Derivative Litig.

    Publication Date: 2021-09-08
    Practice Area: Corporate Governance
    Industry: Manufacturing
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Will
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: P. Bradford deLeeuw, deLeeuw Law LLC, Wilmington, DE; Richard A. Speirs, Christopher Lometti, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, New York, NY; Robert C. Schubert, Willem F. Jonckheer, Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP, San Francisco, CA; Kip B. Shuman, Shuman, Gleen & Stecker, San Francisco, CA; Rusty E. Glenn, Shuman, Gleen & Stecker, Denver, CO; Brett D. Stecker, Shuman, Gleen & Stecker, Ardmore, PA for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Jody C. Barillare, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Troy S. Brown, Laura Hughes McNally, Brian F. Morris, Karen Pieslak Pohlmann, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA; William M. Lafferty, Ryan D. Stottmann, Sabrina M. Hendershot, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter E. Kazanoff, Sara A. Ricciardi, Courtney G. Skarupski, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY; William M. Lafferty, Ryan D. Stottmann, Sabrina M. Hendershot, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Daniel V. McCaughey, Erin Macgowan, Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA; Christian Reigstad, Ropes & Gray LLP, New York, NY; Daniel A. Mason, Matthew D. Stachel, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew J. Ehrlich, Brette Tannenbaum, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY; Kevin G. Abrams, J. Peter Shindel, Jr., Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Paul Vizcarrondo, John F. Lynch, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, NY for defendants.

    Case Number: D69527

    Derivative complaint dismissed for failure to plead demand futility where stockholders could not show that a majority of directors possessed non-public information that caused the company to issue material misstatements or omissions, so that as a result the directors did not face a substantial likelihood of liability to excuse the demand requirement.

  • SerVaas v. Ford Smart Mobility LLC

    Publication Date: 2021-09-08
    Practice Area: Employment Litigation
    Industry: Automotive | Software
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Will
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael A. Barlow, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Renita Sharma, Ty Adams, Charles Sangree, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, New York, NY; George Gasper, Ice Miller LLP, Indianapolis, IN for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Raymond J. DiCamillo, John M. O’Toole, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Katherine V.A. Smith, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Jason J. Mendro, Molly T. Senger, Matt Gregory, Brittany A. Raia, Rebecca Rubin, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.

    Case Number: D69529

    Plaintiffs adequately stated a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in this wrongful termi-nation case, but the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss certain breach of contract, unjust enrichment and Wage Act claims.