Counsel for a shareholder argued Monday afternoon that Tesla should be required to hand over certain board members’ email threads in their entirety, rather than selectively redacting portions that aren’t obviously more privileged.

During a brief virtual hearing before Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick, Joseph Fonti of Bleichmar Fonti & Auld said Tesla is cherry picking what to redact without proving why it should be redacted, while Cravath, Swaine & Moore’s Vanessa Lavely said the fact the redactions are so granular indicates Tesla has only refused to disclose what’s absolutely necessary.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]