AT&T didn’t offer a fair price when taking ownership of an Oregon partnership in 2010, Vice Chancellor Travis Laster found in a decision Wednesday.

After more than 10 years of litigation, the post-trial opinion marks the second bellwether decision over freeze-outs involving a total of 13 former AT&T partnerships, and the fair valuation formula determined by Laster to owe former partners in Salem Cellular Telephone Co. an additional $9.1 million plus interest is now set to be applied to the remaining 12 partnerships.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]