The Third Circuit revived a trademark infringement case between two financial institutions, ruling the district court relied on too narrow of a standard for when trademark confusion in the marketplace exists.

And while noting that the district court’s four-year delay in ruling on the plaintiff’s preliminary injunction motion was “troubling,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said it had confidence in the jurist’s ability to review the case on remand.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]