Appellant Sanyo Jerome Elvie was charged with the malice and felony murder of Marlon Sanders and two counts of possession of a knife during the commission of a felony. After a jury trial, he was found guilty of felony murder during the commission of aggravated assault, as well as one of the weapons charges. The trial court entered judgments of conviction on those guilty verdicts and sentenced Appellant to life imprisonment for murder and to a consecutive five-year term for the weapons offense. A motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals. 1. Construed most strongly in support of the verdicts, the evidence shows that Appellant slapped his wife Sheila McCray in their apartment and that she called the victim, who was her cousin, because she feared for her safety. When the victim arrived, Appellant retrieved two knives from the kitchen and put them into his pants pockets. Thinking that Appellant was going to hurt her, Ms. McCray went into the bedroom and locked the door. Appellant let the victim in and calmly exchanged greetings. The two conversed, there was a knock on the bedroom door, and, after further conversation, Ms. McCray heard the victim utter a single curse. Believing that Appellant had stabbed the victim, Ms. McCray jumped out of the bedroom window and called 911. The police found the victim stabbed to death, and Appellant had fled. After police located and arrested Appellant, he stated that the victim bit him in the mouth and choked him, after which he grabbed a knife and stabbed the victim. However, Ms. McCray heard neither a struggle nor Appellant telling the victim to leave. The evidence was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find Appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes for which he was convicted. Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U. S. 307 99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560 1979; Watson v. State , 289 Ga. 39, 40 1 709 SE2d 2 2011; Robinson v. State , 283 Ga. 229, 230 1 657 SE2d 822 2008.
2. Appellant contends that the trial court violated Edge v. State , 261 Ga. 865 414 SE2d 462 1992 by failing to make clear in its jury instructions that the jurors were to consider voluntary manslaughter before considering whether Appellant was guilty of felony murder. However, before giving a full instruction on voluntary manslaughter and the requisite elements of passion and provocation, the trial court charged the jury as follows: After considering all the evidence, before you would be authorized to return a verdict of guilty of malice murder or felony murder, you must first determine whether mitigating evidence, if any, would cause the offense to be reduced to voluntary manslaughter. This instruction is nearly identical to the pattern charge and has frequently been relied upon in determining that the jury was not given improper sequential instructions in violation of Edge . Hayes v. State , 279 Ga. 642, 644 2 619 SE2d 628 2005; Murphy v. State , 279 Ga. 410, 412 5 614 SE2d 53 2005; James v. State , 270 Ga. 675, 679 9 513 SE2d 207 1999; Suggested Pattern Jury Instructions, Vol. II: Criminal Cases 4th ed., § 2.10.40. See also Turner v. State , 283 Ga. 17, 19 1 655 SE2d 589 2008; Turner v. State , 272 Ga. 441, 442 2 531 SE2d 354 2000. Furthermore,
