This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the special master recommending that Respondent, Robbie M. Levin State Bar No.448280, be suspended for six months based on his guilty pleas to misdemeanor distributing obscene material OCGA § 16-12-80 and criminal attempt to commit interference with custody OCGA § 16-5-45, which the special master found violated Rule 8.4 a 3 of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 d. The State Bar and Levin have filed exceptions to the special master’s report. The facts show that Levin began practicing law in 1996 and developed the habit of visiting sexually oriented “chat rooms” and exposing himself to others via a webcam. In 2007 then 36-year old Levin made contact with a 16-year old girl whose mother was a friend of his. He obtained the mother’s permission to contact the girl and did so through Facebook. He communicated with her four or five times after which, unbeknowst to Levin, he was communicating with an officer pretending to be the girl. At some point Levin revealed an image of himself via webcam in which he was touching his penis, and then he arranged to see a movie with someone he believed to be the girl. When Levin arrived at the meeting place, he was arrested. Levin’s arrest received media attention and he retreated to his parents’ house and did not practice law for six months between October 2007 and April 2008. Levin voluntarily sought treatment through the Behavorial Medicine Institute. His licensed professional counselor, Osborn, testified at the hearing before the special master that Levin had a history of dysthymia low level chronic depression, which was aggravated by his arrest. Testing indicated that Levin’s sexual behavior was out of control but that he does not meet the criteria for pedophilia or any other paraphilia other deviant sexual behaviors in the DSM-IV. Osborn testified that Levin was open and honest, and did not try to minimize or exaggerate his conduct. She recommended that Levin participate in specialized sex offender treatment. Levin participated in the treatment, which consists of 54 weeks of 90-minute group therapy sessions which Levin completed and a maintenance phase of 90-minute group therapy sessions once a month, which is ongoing. Osborn stated that Levin has made positive improvement and is rehabilitated. Levin performed almost 300 hours of community service while living with his parents prior to entering his pleas in 2010. He was sentenced to 40 days in jail, of which he served 20; 12 months on probation for each count, 100 hours of community service for each count, and a $1,000 fine for each count. Levin has paid the fines and pays his assessed probation fees. As terms of probation Levin is prohibited from using “chat rooms” and social networking sites, having contact with the victim’s family or going to the Clayton County courthouse, and he must continue counseling. Levin made a verbal apology to the victim’s family in open court and also prepared a written apology. Levin was married in 2007 and now is working as a lawyer again. Several witnesses testified on his behalf and commented that they have noticed a positive change in him; that he is more humble and appreciative; and that he has performed legal services for them in a good and professional manner. Attorneys who have worked with Levin commented positively on his legal skills and consider him an asset to the legal community.
The special master determined that Levin’s conduct in asking a friend if he could contact her daughter and then attempting to expose himself via webcam, as well as attempting to meet the daughter and suggesting that she fabricate a story about her whereabouts, constituted misdemeanors involving moral turpitude which relate to Levin’s fitness to practice law as they involved dishonesty and possibly a breach of trust, see Comment 3 to Rule 8.4. In mitigation of discipline the special master found no prior disciplinary history, no personal or emotional problems, full and free disclosure and a cooperative attitude towards the disciplinary proceedings, good character and a positive reputation, a delay in the disciplinary proceedings based on no fault of either party, Levin was not convicted until more than two years after the commission of the crimes and the State Bar could not bring proceedings until he was convicted, the imposition of other penalties or sanctions, remorse, and the voluntary suspension of the practice of law for six months, see In the Matter of Onipede , 288 Ga. 156 702 SE2d 136 2010 accepting voluntary surrender of license nunc pro tunc to date Onipede voluntarily stopped practicing law. In aggravation, the special master found vulnerability of the victim, substantial experience in the practice of law, and illegal conduct. The special master concluded that the mitigating factors outweighed the aggravating factors and determined that the State Bar’s recommendation of one to two years suspension was excessive. The special master recommends a suspension of six months with reinstatement conditioned upon confirmation from Osborn, or another qualified professional, that Levin has remained in the maintenance phase of his therapy and that he still is considered to be rehabilitated.
