The state Supreme Court on Monday lifted a ban on a Mississippi law firm’s newspaper advertisement criticizing a Toccoa nursing home, but the justices didn’t weigh in on whether the firm went too far in its attempt to solicit business.

Instead, the high court’s unanimous decision focused on two procedural questions: Did Mountain Circuit Superior Court Judge B. Chan Caudell err in granting a nursing home operator permanent injunctive relief against McHugh Fuller Law Group because the firm did not have sufficient notice? And did the trial court err in deciding that the record in the firm’s initial appeal should not include filings submitted after the permanent injunction was granted?

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]