One way to look at a legal malpractice lawsuit filed against McKenna Long & Aldridge last week is that the firms former client has an uphill battle. After all, the client prevailed in the epic patent battle for which it hired the firm.
But the clients new lawyers claim that big mistakes by McKenna forced the client to bring in King & Spalding to clean up the mess, so McKenna should pay more than $3.5 million. Thats all of what the client paid to McKenna, plus some of what it paid King & Spalding.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
