George M. Weaver
udicial candidates are properly forbidden from making pledges or promises regarding future rulings, other than to be fair and impartial. But the questionnaire developed by the Georgia Christian Coalition, which merely asks if a candidate agrees “most” with the majority or dissenting opinion in certain Supreme Court cases, is a perfectly appropriate vehicle for obtaining information about the general political views and legal philosophies of candidates.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
