FEDERAL ENFORCEMENT of the Clean Water Act has set off a flood of recent court decisions, regulatory actions and legislative proposals that have muddied the issue of which wetlands should be protected from pollution.
The murkiness still exists even though a year has passed since the U.S. Supreme Court issued a divided ruling in Rapanos v. U.S., 126 S. Ct. 2208 2006, which sought to clarify the scope of the government’s jurisdiction over wetlands.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
