Lawyers challenging the constitutionality of voter identification laws across the country said that last month’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which upheld a voter identification law in Indiana, would have limited impact on their own cases.
Lawyers are moving forward in their cases by pointing out numerous factual differences, such as the distinctive requirements of their state’s voter ID law and a host of statistics that back up their claims.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
