What You Need to Know
- Several Georgia judges have presided over multiple jury trials resulting in $10 million or larger verdicts in the past five years.
- Gwinnett, DeKalb and Fulton county courts produced 41% of the state's top verdicts between Jan. 1, 2018, and April 10.
- Wrongful death, motor vehicle tort, medical malpratice and workplace negligence claims account for 78% of Georgia's eight-figure or higher verdicts since January 2018.
Lawyers looking to clench multimillion-dollar jury verdicts might stand a better chance if bringing a wrongful-death or medical-malpractice case in metro Atlanta's Gwinnett, DeKalb or Fulton counties. Over the past five years, juries in the counties' state and superior courts have awarded eight-figure or higher verdicts 16 times, according to Law.com's Verdict Search. Much like the venues in which these top verdicts are produced, repetition also exists among the judges presiding over these multimillion-dollar outcomes. Of the 39 jury verdicts awarded at or in excess of $10 million between Jan. 1, 2018 and April 10, 2023, at least three Georgia judges presided over 44% of the underlying trials.
|
These Judges Presided Over Multiple Jury Trials Resulting in $10 Million or More Verdicts
|Judge Joseph C. Iannazzone
Gwinnett County leads the state with six jury verdicts returned at or in excess of $10 million in the past five years, per Law.com's Verdict Search. With two of the verdicts returned by Gwinnett County Superior Court juries, 66% of the multimillion-dollar outcomes occurred in Gwinnett County State Court. Of those four jury awards at or exceeding eight-figures, Judge Joseph C. Iannazzone presided over 75% of the trials. Iannazzone made headlines in August after jurors returned a $1.7 billion punitive award against Ford Motor Co. in the product liability case of Hill v. Ford. Ford announced its plans to appeal the verdict the following month. Prior to the pandemic, Iannazzone presided over two trials producing high-value verdicts. In May 2019, the Gwinnett County State Court judge oversaw Johnson v. Francis et al., a medical-malpractice matter that resulted in a $14 million jury verdict. The case later settled in August 2020 for a confidential amount following an award of additional legal fees. Meanwhile in November 2018, Iannazzone held a wrongful-death trial in Herrera v. Extended Stay America et al in which the jury awarded $46 million. Defendants satisfied the judgment as of Feb. 18, 2019, per Iannazzone's docket.
|
'Heard Round the World:' Ford Hit With $1.7B Punitive Damages Verdict in Ga. Trial
|
Judge Steve C. Jones
Seated upon the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia bench, Judge Steve C. Jones presided over two 2022 trials that produced nine-figure jury verdicts. Jones kicked off the year signing off on a $127 million jury verdict awarded in the wrongful death and product liability case of Andrews et al v. Autoliv Japan, Ltd. in January 2022. The matter is currently on appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Eight months later, Jones presided over Edwards v. Grubbs et al, an excessive force complaint against the city of Atlanta and one of its former police officers. The jury returned a $100 million verdict in the matter, but Jones reduced the award by $60 million the following month upon granting a renewed Rule 50 (b) Motion by the city of Atlanta to set aside the nine-figure jury verdict and enter judgment as a matter of law.
|
$60M Award Set Aside After City of Atlanta Clinches Rule 50 Motion for Judgment
|
Andrew Prather II
Like Jones, Prather presided over a pair of jury trials that resulted in two verdicts in excess of $10 million within the same year. In July 2019, the Muscogee County State Court chief judge held a trial in the wrongful-death case of Thornton v. Ralston GA LLC, et al that resulted in a $125 million verdict. The case later settled for a confidential amount. At more than double the initial jury award, Prather's courtroom garnered more spotlight a month later when jurors returned a $280 million verdict in Madere v. Greenwich Insurance Co., another wrongful death matter. But the verdict didn't remain intact as awarded. In accordance with Georgia law, Prather reduced $100 million awarded in punitive damages to $250,000, slashing the overall verdict to $180.3 million. |
Jurors' Award Motivations
What motivates Georgia jurors to continue awarding multimillion-dollar verdicts varies depending on who's asked. Atlanta litigator Cameron D. Hawkins said Fulton County Superior Court jurors awarded more damages against a corporate defendant in a personal injury case to offset attorney's fees. "That was an interesting aspect that I've been hearing through other people who have tried cases. Now I've experienced that," Hawkins said. "[The jury] upped the award, so it wasn't just based on what they thought it was worth, or what they thought would compensate the plaintiff. They also added a little extra in there because they know attorneys are going to take a fee." But other attorneys, like Michael L. Bell of Lightfoot, Franklin & White in Birmingham, Alabama, attribute the eight-figure or larger outcomes to a societal desensitization to the value of money, coupled with enhanced emotional reactions to current social conditions. "There's no doubt that our modern juries are unhappy," Bell told the Daily Report in January. "There's a fair amount of distrust."
|
'Modern Juries Are Unhappy': 6 Ways to Win Them Over
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute read'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Justices Will Weigh Constitutionality of Law Allowing Terror Victims to Sue PLO
- 2Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 3OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 44th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 5Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250