Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Ted Lavender and David Newdorf. Ted Lavender (left )and David Newdorf. (Courtesy photos)

The Georgia Supreme Court on Thursday took up a question that lower courts have answered uniformly, albeit with no small degree of frustration: Does the state’s bar on “wrongful birth” claims leave no recourse for parents who bought sperm from a highly touted donor later revealed to have mental issues and a criminal record.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Greg Land

Greg Land covers topics including verdicts and settlements and insurance-related litigation for the Daily Report in Atlanta.

More from this author

Law Firms Mentioned


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.