Plaintiff Gets Refund for Coronavirus Cancellations, but Delta Class Action to Stay on Course, Lawyer Says
"This Class Action Complaint comes during a time of unprecedented hardship for so many Americans, with each day bringing different news regarding the novel coronavirus COVID-19," the complaint said.
April 27, 2020 at 11:05 AM
4 minute read
A lawyer for the lead plaintiff in a putative class action against Atlanta-based Delta Air Lines Inc. over ticket refunds confirmed Friday that the lawsuit is still taking off, even though the company has given the demanded refund.
Elliot Daniels of Maryland did get his $3,090 back for four tickets on a canceled international flight from Dulles International Airport in Northern Virginia to Cairo, according to the company and his lawyers. But that was after the lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on April 17.
"They picked him off, but that doesn't eliminate the lawsuit," Bill Stone of the Stone Law Group said Friday. "What will happen is another plaintiff is going to step up. There are a lot of them."
Stone's firm, with offices in Atlanta, Rome and Blakely, Georgia, is serving as local counsel on the case for Steve Berman, Daniel Kurowski and Whitney Siehl of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro in Chicago. Stone said he expects the team to file a substitution of parties or a new complaint.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of others are similarly situated, and more than $5 million is at stake, according to the complaint.
The issue is the same with the Delta lawsuit as with others filed against airlines, concert bookers and baseball teams since the start of the novel coronavirus pandemic: cash back for canceled tickets. Whether it's travel, concerts or baseball, customers are not much in the mood for a rain check.
"This Class Action Complaint comes during a time of unprecedented hardship for so many Americans, with each day bringing different news regarding the novel coronavirus COVID-19," the complaint said. "Social distancing, sheltering-in-place, and efforts to 'flatten the curve' have separated loved ones from their relatives, workers from their co-workers, and further isolated those already in or at risk of further isolation. It has decimated nationwide employment. Nearly 9 in 10 Americans are now subject to a travel restriction, all to protect the health and welfare of the nation during this public health emergency."
The complaint gave a detailed timeline of the developing health crisis that started with news from Wuhan, China, on Dec. 31. It accuses Delta of violating U.D. Department of Transportation policy: "If your flight is cancelled and you choose to cancel your trip as a result, you are entitled to a refund for the unused transportation—even for non-refundable tickets."
Steering customers to credits for future flights is the issue, according to the complaint.
"Delta took a variety of steps to make it difficult, if not impossible, for consumers to receive any refund on pandemic cancelled flights," the complaint said. "Defendant wanted to retain the money paid to Defendant, given the severe economic losses it is incurring related to pandemic flight cancellations. It does so despite consumers' right to receive a refund for unused transportation, even for non-refundable tickets."
Delta denied the charges in a written statement shared with the Daily Report.
"With regard to this the lawsuit: Doing right by our customers through refunds and rebookings has been—and will continue to be—a key focus as we manage through this unprecedented global pandemic. The named plaintiff in this suit first requested a refund on April 15—two days before the lawsuit was filed. We expedited the refund process and gladly issued his refund," the company said.
The complaint, however, alleged that Daniels had been requesting a refund since Delta canceled his rebooked March 31 flight. Daniels allegedly was told he'd have to accept a travel voucher. He went onto the company website and submitted a refund request on March 28, which Delta denied on April 15, limiting him to travel credits, the suit claims.
The complaint also cited instructions on the Delta website offering travel credits for canceled flights. But the company said it will return cash.
"With regard to refunds generally: In keeping with our longstanding policy, Delta continues to provide full refunds to eligible passengers requesting them for whom we have cancelled a flight or made a significant schedule change," the company said. "In March 2020 alone, Delta processed more than one million refunds. Eligible customers may request refunds online at delta.com or contact a reservations agent."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWoman Sues Atlanta Airport for Injuries Allegedly Sustained in Fall
Judges Rule State Takeover of Nashville Airport's Board Violates Tennessee Constitution
4 minute readDelta Defied Labor Law by Failing to Provide Seating, Former Employee Alleges
2 minute readResidents Sue Delta, Alaska Air, Port of Seattle Over Airport Pollution Claims
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250