Attorney Gary Coulter in the documentary “Mr. Dial has Something to Say.”  (Photo: YouTube)

Athens attorney Gary Coulter was disbarred Monday by the Supreme Court of Georgia over how he handled Southern folk art collector and promoter Bill Arnett’s legal and business affairs.

The high court said Coulter administered more than $1 million of Arnett’s funds using 12 different bank accounts he established but failed to keep records for them. None of the accounts were trust accounts, the high court’s unsigned opinion said.

In addition, Coulter at one point stockpiled more than 100 pieces of art valued at more than $850,000 in his unsecured law office, allegedly as collateral for unpaid legal fees, the high court said.

Arnett discovered and is credited with creating a market for Southern folk artists that included Thornton Dial. The artwork at issue in Arnett’s bar complaint was by Dial, according to papers filed in the disciplinary case.

In disbarring Coulter, the high court rejected a recommendation from a special master to suspend Coulter’s bar license for four years. That recommendation was made by Drew Eckl Farnham partner Sandra Cho, whom the bar appointed to review the complaint.

Justices Carol Hunstein, Harold Melton, Michael Boggs and Keith Blackwell dissented without comment.

The disbarment marked the second time the bar recommended disciplinary action against Coulter for his representation of Arnett.

The high court unanimously rejected a special master’s recommendation last year to accept Coulter’s voluntary petition to suspend his license for two years.

Atlanta attorney Linley Jones, who filed the bar complaint against Coulter on Arnett’s behalf six years ago, celebrated the ruling Monday.

Jones said she filed the complaint because Coulter was “taking money for outrageous amounts of unearned legal fees” from Arnett, who over time had entrusted the attorney with handling many of his financial matters.

In addition, Coulter “had set up multiple accounts that appeared to be established in order to conceal that,” Jones explained. More than 100 works of art belonging to Arnett migrated from an art warehouse to Coulter’s law office without Arnett’s knowledge, she said. Coulter had access to that warehouse.

The opinion noted that Coulter secured $850,000 in artwork  as collateral for what he claimed were legal fees. Coulter acknowledged in disciplinary filings that the artwork was all done by Dial and that pieces were to cover owed and future fees.

The artwork was eventually recovered from Coulter, Jones said.

Arnett trusted Coulter “and should have been able to trust him,” Jones said. “He was a lawyer with fiduciary obligations. Mr. Arnett never questioned that he [Coulter] was acting against his best interest.”

Jones said Coulter’s disbarment was particularly gratifying, as it came on the heels of the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art’s opening for an exhibition for paintings Arnett originally acquired and that became part of an extensive collection held by the Souls Grown Deep Foundation Arnett established.

That exhibition, “History Refused to Die,” opened May 22 and includes more than 30 paintings, sculptures, drawing and quilts that Souls Grown Deep donated to the Met.

“It was a remarkable turn of events,” said Jones, a member of the foundation’s board. “We are glad to finally see justice served.”

Coulter could not be reached for comment. In formal responses filed during the bar investigation, Coulter said Arnett typically owed him “substantial sums” of unpaid fees.

Coulter said he and Arnett “had constant communications regarding how the unpaid invoices would be paid, secured or protected,” and that Arnett “occasionally” gave him authority to make partial payments to the law firm through Arnett’s accounts.

Arnett’s art sales “supported the payments made to the law firm,” Coulter contended, adding that the payments were sometimes negotiated as percentages from specific sales.

Coulter did acknowledge that, after 2008, he did not mail billing statements or invoices to Arnett, did not keep complete records of all of Arnett’s funds and “did not always promptly notify the Arnetts of my receipt of funds in which one or more of them had an interest.”

According to Monday’s ruling, Coulter first represented Arnett in a landlord-tenant dispute and a personal tax matter in 2003. He also represented Dial and Arnett’s late wife. Coulter’s representation of Arnett subsequently expanded to include dozens of Arnett’s personal and business matters, including depositing, transferring and disbursing Arnett’s funds in connection with a number of his businesses.

According to the ruling, while Arnett knew of some of the accounts Coulter opened on his behalf, he was unaware of others, including accounts where Coulter was the sole signer.

“Coulter concedes these accounts were not approved lawyer-trust accounts and that they held only funds related to the client and his businesses, yet Coulter transferred funds from or through [Arnett’s] accounts to his operating account as payment of attorney fees,” the opinion said.

In 2011 alone, Coulter handled more than $1 million belonging to Arnett using 12 different bank accounts. That was more than half of Arnett’s annual revenue, according to the opinion. Coulter then paid himself over $400,000 in fees from those accounts but failed to provide Arnett with any billing invoices for work allegedly performed after 2008.

In 2011, two of Coulter’s former associates printed a set of invoices from the firm’s billing system and gave them to Arnett, the opinion said. Those invoices “contained substantial discrepancies that Coulter could not explain,” the opinion said. The two associates also filed bar complaints against Coulter, which were resolved, along with Arnett’s, by Coulter’s disbarment.

Coulter’s disbarment is the third time he has faced disciplinary action by the bar and the high court. Coulter received a letter of admonition in 2003 and was given a public reprimand in 2017.