The hiring of nonattorney staff such as a paralegal can implicate some similar ethics issues as hiring a lateral attorney. For example, a paralegal often has in their possession confidential information relating to those matters on which the paralegal provides professional services. When that paralegal moves to a new law firm, the paralegal’s prior work on other matters could create conflicts of interest for the new law firm.

Not all law firms treat these issues with the seriousness they may deserve. The consequences of such omissions can be serious, but they are avoidable. The Supreme Court of Georgia provided guidance for law firms in navigating these issues to avoid a disqualifying imputed conflict of interest in its decision in Hodge v. Urfa-Sexton, LP, 295 Ga. 136 (2014).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]