A man involved in a dispute over his efforts to collect about $160,000 judgment by garnishing his debtor’s retirement payments must wait until another lawyer—who formerly represented the debtor—has collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees he has long been owed but only sought to collect when his former client was garnished.
The contentious dispute has already spurred a libel suit against the creditor’s lawyer over comments he made to the Daily Report concerning the creditor’s lawyer’s tactics.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
