The Florida Supreme Court will be hearing a controversial case today involving dual maternity. When Florida Legislature first enacted statute 742.14, the case of T.M.H v. D.M.T certainly was not contemplated — nor were certain advancements in medical technology.

The facts in the case are undisputed. T.M.H and D.M.T. were involved in a committed same-sex relationship for a number of years and jointly decided to have a child together as equal paternal partners. The biological mother, T.M.H., provided her ova to the birth mother, D.M.T. The ova was fertilized and then implanted into the birth mother.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]