Dusk falls over the Florida Supreme Court building Jan. 31, 2011, in Tallahassee. Photo: Phil Sears/Special to the Daily Business Review
Some foreclosure defense attorneys had feared a state appellate court ruling in Glass v. Nationstar Mortgage would leave them unable to collect fees.
January 04, 2019 at 03:59 PM
1 minute read
Journalist
A divided Florida Supreme Court on Friday ruled on a closely watched case concerning attorney fees that elicited about a dozen amicus briefs—some claiming far-reaching implications on contract law and deals involving assets assigned from one owner to the next.
The high court sided with borrower Marie Ann Glass, who was seeking attorney fees from plaintiff Nationstar Mortgage LLC after the dismissal of a foreclosure suit against her.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
