'Uber for Attorneys' or the Wild West? Florida Senate Hearing Highlights Divide Over Traffic Ticket Startup
Coral Gables-based traffic ticket startup Tikd lobbied for a quickly withdrawn amendment to Florida's law regulating attorneys.
January 25, 2018 at 04:45 PM
5 minute read
The Ticket Clinic founder Mark Gold is pleased as punch after two new developments in his law firm's showdown with Coral Gables-based ticket-fighting startup Tikd.
First, a Florida state senator on Wednesday withdrew an amendment that would have made Tikd and other “traffic infraction networks” exempt from penalties for the unlicensed practice of law. The withdrawal came minutes after Gold told senators the bill put “the practice of law itself” at stake.
Former Florida Bar President Ramon Abadin withdrew his appearance for Tikd the same day in an $11 million antitrust lawsuit against the bar and the Ticket Clinic for allegedly trying to drive the startup out of business. Last month, the bar moved to disqualify Abadin, claiming his 2015-16 presidency gave him access to confidential information relevant to the litigation.
But the tiff between the 30-year-old, 300-employee Ticket Clinic and its new tech-driven rival Tikd is far from over. And the dispute raises questions that weigh heavily on the minds of legal practitioners around the country as tech companies invade the legal space.
Tikd was founded about a year ago by a nonlawyer, Chris Riley. He had the idea to play a game of averages: A motorist can upload a minor traffic ticket, pay a fee lower than the fine on the citation, and Tikd will contract a lawyer to fight the ticket. If the lawyer loses, Tikd promises to refund the client's money. But most of the time, Tikd figures the lawyer will win.
The company spent its early days under a bar investigation, and last month the Florida Bar board of governors voted to pursue litigation against Tikd for violating rules on the unlicensed practice of law.
In the meantime, Tikd hired lobbying firm Ballard Partners to look into changing the state law regulating attorneys. State Sen. Jeff Brandes, R-St. Petersburg, filed his proposal before the Senate regulated industries committee Wednesday.
Testimony at the hearing outlined the divide on the issue: Should Florida deregulate companies like Tikd to give consumers more choice, or would that open the door to a stream of techies accountable to no one?
Ballard Partners lobbyist Mathew Forrest told senators the proposed amendment would not affect bar rules. Instead, it would open up the marketplace for ticket-dismissal platforms like those popping up around the country — GetDismissed, LegalTap and WinIt.
“I think of it as Uber for attorneys,” Forrest said. “This basically provides a platform for a consumer to get an attorney. All the usual rules that an attorney has are still in place. … This is great for the consumer because they have the convenience now to get an attorney, and it's also great for the attorney.”
Florida Bar lawyer Warren Husband of Metz, Husband & Daughton in Tallahassee attended the hearing and told senators the bar had no position on the bill.
Gold had a clear position. “This bill is clearly the unauthorized practice of law by nonlawyers, unregulated, and it's going to be the Wild West if it's allowed,” he testified.
He said the amendment was a slippery slope that could allow his nonlawyer neighbor to open shop doing real estate closings for $1,000 and hire an attorney at $250 to do the work with no oversight to prevent him from absconding with customers' money.
“Who's stopping them?” Gold asked of Tikd. “They can say anything they want, they can do anything they want, they can close up shop whenever they want, and there's no one there to stop them.”
Brandes withdrew his measure immediately after Gold's remarks.
“Look, these ideas sometimes take years to germinate,” Brandes told colleagues. “Uber took us four years to get through this process. I'm going to save us all a little bit of problems and withdraw this amendment at this time.”
Tikd declined to comment on its next steps.
Gold called the withdrawal a “big win” for The Ticket Clinic, along with Abadin's decision to bow out of the federal antitrust litigation.
Robert Kuntz of Devine Goodman Rasco & Watts-FitzGerald in Coral Gables will step in as local counsel. Co-counsel Peter Kennedy and David King of Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody in Austin, Texas, are handling a number of antitrust cases against state bars.
“Given the arguments at the hearing regarding the motion to disqualify Abadin and the pending motion for sanctions filed by my counsel, Chris Kleppin, I believe he had no choice but to withdraw or face much more dire consequences,” Gold said.
The bar declined to comment.
Abadin, a Coral Gables solo practitioner who made technology's impact on the practice of law a focus of his bar presidency, referred a request for comment to Tikd, which offered no response Thursday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEmployee's Alleged Action Lands Marriott in Court for Defamation, Negligence
Wave of Office Closures Highlights the Weighty Stakes Surrounding Law Firm Growth
7 minute readQuinn Emanuel's Miami Office Cracks 20 Attorneys, Three Years After Arrival
3 minute readJudge Dismisses Civilian Investigative Panel Lawsuit: A Setback for Miami's Police Oversight
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250