Lawyers for Wells Fargo Bank squared off Thursday at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit against those representing what they hope remains a class of plaintiffs challenging the bank’s overdraft practices.
The question the judges were tasked with answering seemed deceptively simple: Did Wells Fargo forfeit its right to enforce arbitration clauses in its customers’ contracts years after it began litigating the case in court and after the class had been certified by the trial court?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
