Bring it on, says the Sixth Circuit, which recently explored the question of what makes a cheerleading uniform a cheerleading uniform, according to Lauren Kuley of Squire Patton Boggs. In the case, Varsity Brands sued Star Athletica for copying its designs. The district court granted summary judgment to Star, stating Varsity did not hold valid copyright to the designs. But the Sixth Circuit reversed, and “along the way, the court addressed several unsettled issues of copyright law,” says Kuley.

First, Kuley explains the court settled the matter of deference that is owed to the Copyright Office. “That determination, the court concluded, is entitled to Skidmore deference, not the higher Chevron deference,” Kuley says. For more information on those standards, see here.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]