A federal judge in Nevada has set a hearing for today to rule on whether Righthaven, the so-called "copyright troll," and its in-house lawyers should be sanctioned for misleading the court. In an odd twist, the defendant in the case has stepped forward to argue on behalf of two in-house lawyers, saying responsibility should fall on Righthaven's CEO.
July 14, 2011 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
A federal judge in Nevada has set a July 14 hearing date to rule on whether so-called “copyright troll” company Righthaven LLC and its in-house lawyers should be sanctioned for misleading the court.
And in an odd twist, the defendant being sued by that company has stepped forward to argue on behalf of two in-house lawyers.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
Job Opportunity: Location: Prestigious Florida Law Firm seeks to hire a Business attorney with at least 5 years of experience for their Ft. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
