Do Associate Perks Make a Difference in the Law Firm Talent War?
After years of salary brinkmanship, many firms are looking for more effective ways to attract top-flight talent.
July 29, 2019 at 10:55 AM
5 minute read
Money isn't everything.
That, at least, is what several firms in Big Law want to believe as they continue to roll out perks and initiatives to lure and retain associates.
Last week, Reed Smith—a firm that has chosen not to match the top dollar many law firms pay their associates—unveiled a new slate of perks for its attorneys, including changes to the firm's billable hour policy, a continuing education track and an internal recognition program.
“Reed Smith should be applauded, and I wish more firms would think of creative ways to hire people instead of being on an auction block,” said Joe Ankus, a 30-year legal recruiter and founder of Ankus Consulting.
The firm rejected the $190,000 associate benchmark set by Milbank last year, citing the “interest of its clients,” and first-year salaries hover between $150,000 and $180,000 according to ALM's Legal Compass. That trend could be growing: A 2019 report by the National Association for Law Placement found that fewer firms have followed Milbank's lead.
Greenberg Traurig also refused to engage in the salary war and instead has focused on offering associates what it considers a more rounded experience. The firm offers alternative attorney tracks, online career development platforms and law firm economic training sessions conducted by co-president Brad Kaufman, among other programs.
“Compensation is only one part of the total associate package,” he said. “We are committed to helping our associates enhance their core competencies, deliver positive and urgent client service and build their business development skills, while also creating a collaborative environment and recognizing the need for maintaining a work-life balance.”
To be sure, it's not easy to quantify the value of these attract-and-retain initiatives or measure how effective they are in luring and keeping associates who might be considering higher-paying offers. But Scott Westfahl, who consults with numerous Am Law 100 firms as director of executive education at Harvard Law School, calls the salary wars “a race to the bottom,” noting that big salaries aren't enough to differentiate a firm from its competitors.
“The value proposition for talent at a law firm, if it isn't differentiated on other metrics, boils down to salaries,” Westfahl said. “Then everybody is losing profitability instead of creating a differentiated model.”
Estimates indicate the cost of the last associate salary hike may run as high as seven figures for a large firm like Milbank, and corporate clients have made it clear they aren't happy about the yearly raises, as the cost is often passed along to them in the form of higher billing rates. Attrition is also still a major issue across the career spectrum: 47% of laterals leave within five years.
While many firms now offer business development training and flexible work schedules for attorneys going on leave, Westfahl said it's paramount that these perks are front and center in the firm's recruitment process.
“One you have to differentiate, two you have to market,” he said. “The hottest topic in the corporate talent world is brand differentiation.”
Even firms that did raise salaries have developed policies similar to Reed Smith's.
Milbank, for example, has its own education program—Milbank@Harvard—which is administered with the help of Westfahl. All fourth-, fifth- and sixth-year associates take business classes at Harvard University each year to learn about finance, business development and marketing. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett has a similar arrangement with Columbia Business School.
“It definitely helps our lateral recruiting,” said Milbank partner and executive director David Wolfson. “Our ability to train people within Milbank is one of the most important when you join us. We can give you lots of money, but it doesn't have the same value over the course of your life.”
Other training programs at Milbank are specific to practice areas. Deals@Milbank teaches transactional skills such as drafting and negotiating; Advocacy@Milbank trains litigators in such skills such as presentation and writing. The firm also has moved into a new 250,000-square-foot office in Manhattan's new and trendy Hudson Yards in an effort to modernize its image.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld also has special associate initiatives, such as a short-term travel program that allows lawyers at the third-year level and above to spend time in other offices. And, like at Reed Smith, many of its special programs originated from associate committee meetings or hackathons—a very important asset in the recruiting market, said Lauren Marsh, Akin Gump's director of attorney recruiting.
“These changes were important to our chairperson Kim Koopersmith and senior leaders,” Marsh said. “Being able to tell potential hires that many of these policies came out of suggestions from associates reflects that the firm is willing to hear them out and ensure they're satisfied.”
|Similar Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland Partner Heads to Paul Hastings as Firm Seeks to 'Gain Market Share' in Practice
3 minute readWhite & Case Adds O'Melveny Energy Project Development Partner in Houston
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for law firm Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250