Am Law Firms With Zero Black Partners—How Is This Possible in 2019?
Is it too much to ask that major law firms do better than 1% on this front?
June 06, 2019 at 06:05 PM
5 minute read
Editor's note: Since the original publication of this post, Fragomen has issued a response. The firm's statement is now included in the post.
Am I the only one who thinks this is screwy?
According to The American Lawyer's latest Diversity Scorecard, this year's winner for the top diversity prize has a superb record on diversity overall, but zero black partners!
Yup, you heard correctly.
And we're not talking about some firm in Idaho where African Americans are scarce. No, we're talking about a 371-lawyer firm with its primary office in New York: immigration giant Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy.
It was ranked No. 1 for its outstanding diversity record—nearly a third of all its lawyers (32.5%) and almost a quarter of its partners (23.9%) are minorities. Mighty impressive stats except for that no black partner thing. (The Diversity Scorecard pertains to U.S.-based lawyers.)
Of course, Fragomen is not the only firm in the Am Law 100 with no black partners. It has tony (the toniest?) company: Cravath, Swaine & Moore. (Cravath's first and last black partner was Rowan Wilson, who left the firm in 2017 to become a judge on New York's Court of Appeals.) And until the most recent round of partnership elections, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson was in that club too.
After contacting three people at Fragomen (chairman Austin Fragomen, executive committee member Carmita Alonso, and CMO Alison Arjoon) for comment, the firm issued the following after the post's publication: “At Fragomen, we are proud to foster a culture that celebrates diversity and inclusiveness and is representative of our diverse employees and clients globally. In addition to racial and ethnic diversity, we are committed to providing equal opportunities for all, and we believe our diversity of thought and unique perspectives makes us even stronger. While we appreciate being a recognized leader in diversity, we continue to proactively take steps to develop an even more diverse partnership and workforce.”
And Cravath issued this statement: “Talent development is the critical driver of our success at Cravath, and integral to that is our commitment to diversity and an inclusive workplace. We remain intently focused on providing all of our lawyers the opportunity to excel and are proud that our most recent class of associates is 60% women and 36% diverse, and that over the last four years, 64% of our new partners have been women. Diversity and inclusion are key business priorities for the firm and we are always striving to do better.“
At the risk of sounding paranoid, I don't think anyone is anxious to talk to me about this issue. Whatever.
In any case, why flagellate Fragomen and Cravath when there are plenty of major firms where the stats on black partners suck?
A number of firms, including Davis Polk & Wardwell, are on thin ice, having only one lone black partner. In fact, I combed through the diversity data and compiled a list of AmLaw 100 firms with 1% or less black partners—and here they are:
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 1%
- Debevoise & Plimpton 1%*
- Fish & Richardson 0.5%
- Davis Polk & Wardwell 0.8%
- Haynes and Boone 0.4%
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore 0%
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher 1%*
- Mayer Brown 0.8%
- Davis Wright Tremaine 0.7%
- Williams & Connolly 1%
- Fried Frank 0%*
- Dorsey & Whitney 0.4%
( *Since the publication of Am Law's 2019 diversity data, the firm has elected a new black partner.)
Is it too much to ask that major law firms do better than 1% on the black partner front? Apparently so. And keep in mind, I'm not even asking sticky questions, like how many black partners have equity. Nor am I looking beyond the Am Law 100, which presumably should have the resources to recruit and promote black lawyers.
“People should be appalled that there's only one black partner in a firm with over 300 lawyers,” says recruiter Ronald Jordan, who specializes in placing diverse lawyers. What's frustrating, explains Jordan, is that “firms with no black partners will ask me to go get some, then ask that they bring in $1.5 to $2 million in business.” He adds, “firms need to make the investment in black lawyers; they do it all the time for white lawyers.”
Jordan is right: We should be appalled about the state of black lawyers at the nation's biggest, most profitable firms. Sadly, however, we've gotten used to the dearth of black partners at major firms. Sometimes, even having one black partner seems miraculous.
Our expectations were never that high, but how low can they sink?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter @lawcareerist
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
6 minute readHSF's American Dream: What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250