New Littler 'On Demand' App Has a Human Side: Shift Lawyers
The labor and employment giant says combining technology with lawyers on demand will address client "pain points" and create a new career category within the firm.
May 09, 2019 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Labor and employment specialist Littler Mendelson wants its new technology-based platform, Littler onDemand, to give clients an alternative to increasing the size of their in-house legal departments.
The platform, to be unveiled Thursday, will use both technology and a team of dedicated ”on demand” counsel to give clients real-time answers to their pressing legal questions.
Littler shareholder Scott Forman, who founded the platform, said it was developed in response to clients who identified the expense of dedicating resources to handle day-to-day human resources expertise as one of their biggest “pain points.”
The announcement follows Littler's 2019 Employer Survey, released this week, which shows that 64% of general counsel and in-house lawyers expect their legal service providers to leverage technology to increase operational efficiency.
“It's right on point with what the market is asking for,” Forman said: “The desire to have more efficient legal services and the desire to not have inconsistent advice.”
Clients will use the service by submitting questions on a newly built app, either via mobile or desktop. If the question has already been asked in an organization, it will elicit previous attorney responses. And for new inquiries, on-call Littler “on-demand” attorneys—who have an average of 15 years of experience and will work a set shift—will work to generate real-time answers. They can either respond directly or collaborate with Littler attorneys with more specialized knowledge on particularly complex questions.
Fees will range from traditional hourly rates, blended rates or any other arrangements sought by clients. Regardless, Forman said that the expense for clients would be less than the cost of salary and benefits for new in-house counsel.
Clients will also have access to a dashboard that shows what other questions are being asked, in order to gain a picture of other issues or concerns that they should have on their radar. Forman gave the example of a wage and hour question that might alert a client to a compliance issue or stimulate an opportunity for further training.
The new platform also relies on a recognition that the traditional law firm career progression does not work for everyone.
“For years, you would come in as a lawyer and then be on the partnership track or no longer at a firm,” Forman said. “We're very cognizant that today's lawyers are looking for different things.”
He added that many lawyers who moved in-house seeking greater certainty about their hours were encountering some of the same expectations they faced at firms.
“This delivers what most people mistakenly believe the in-house position offers: a set schedule, working on interesting legal issues for important clients,” Forman said of the “on demand” lawyers, who essentially work as an extension of the client's legal team.
Forman said that the firm hired a handful of on-demand lawyers Wednesday and that it had a pipeline of others that it was interested in, as it is actively looking to add to the team.
A number of clients are also already on board, having signed up while the platform was in beta in 2018.
“There are some clients and attorneys that have reached out to us based on hearing about it, and we think this is going to be a real game changer for us and the legal market,” Forman said.
|Read More
An Open Letter to Full-Service Law Firms: Put In-House Lawyers Out of Business
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaker & Hostetler to Open Austin Office With 10-Lawyer Locke Lord Affordable Housing Team
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 2‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
- 33 Incidents Lead to Charges Against the Alexander Brothers; Cousin Remains at Large
- 4Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Combined Class of Partners and Counsel in Firm History
- 5High Court Drops Case Over Nvidia's Effort to Ditch Fraud Suit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250