Two years ago, a Virginia judge tore Rambus to pieces for allegedly shredding documents while preparing to sue rivals for infringement. On Tuesday, the Federal Circuit discarded Judge Robert Payne's order written during a patent fight between the chip licensing company and Samsung. The panel wrote that Payne didn't have the jurisdiction to issue the order criticizing the company's tactics. That's because Rambus had already offered to pay Samsung's attorney fees, effectively ending the district court case.
April 30, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Two years ago, a Virginia judge tore Rambus to pieces for allegedly shredding documents while preparing to sue rivals for patent infringement.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit discarded Judge Robert Payne’s cutting 116-page order written during a patent fight between the Los Altos, Calif., chip licensing company and Samsung in Eastern Virginia U.S. District Court.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
