Kugle v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.

Because "death penalty" sanctions were inappropriate for what the trial court perceived to be perjury by one of the plaintiffs and because the trial court did not consider lesser sanctions, the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the suit.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Concurring and dissenting opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

Bridgett Fabila (“Bridgett”), Juan Antonio Fabila, Jr. (“Juan”), Juan Antonio Fabila, Sr., and Ana Elva Fabila, individually and in various representative capacities (collectively referred to as the “Fabilas”), sued DaimlerChrysler Corp. (“DaimlerChrysler) and North Star Dodge Sales, Inc. (“North Star Dodge”) after a horrific car accident that resulted in several deaths and numerous injuries. Alleging both witness and evidence tampering, DaimlerChrysler and North Star Dodge moved for sanctions against the Fabilas and their attorneys, Robert Kugle, Robert Wilson, III, and Andrew Toscano. After conducting a hearing, the trial court entered a final judgment holding Kugle, Wilson, and Toscano jointly and severally liable for more than $865,000 in monetary sanctions and imposing “death penalty” sanctions by dismissing the Fabilas’ personal injury and wrongful death suit. The Fabilas, Kugle, Wilson and Toscano appeal, contending the trial court: (1) abused its discretion in denying their motion to abate or stay the sanctions hearing; (2) assessed unjust or excessive sanctions; and (3) erred in admitting and excluding certain evidence. We affirm the portion of the trial court’s judgment assessing sanctions against Kugle, Wilson, and Toscano. We reverse the portion of the trial court’s judgment dismissing the underlying cause with prejudice and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

5 Ways to Use Technology and Innovative Staffing to Better Manage Workplace Legal Questions

Brought to you by Littler
Download Now

Unlock the untapped potential of your document review teams! Their expertise and case knowledge often go underutilized in subsequent stages of disputes or investigations. Discover how rethinking the role of review teams can empower lawyers to leverage their valuable skills and knowledge for maximum impact.

Strategies to Make the Most of Your Document Review Team

Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now

This case study demonstrates the strategy and tools a leading global finance platform company deployed to respond to a Department of Justice (DOJ) Second Request in just 106 days, which enabled them to complete a pressing acquisition. Download it now to learn more about their success.

Speed, Slack and Specialization: A Precision Approach to Second Requests

Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now

From Data to Decisions

Dynamically explore and compare data on law firms, companies, individual lawyers, and industry trends.

Exclusive Depth and Reach.

Law.com Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM’s deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can’t be found anywhere else.

Big Pictures and Fine Details

Law.com Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms’ financials, staffing, clients, news and events.

Pennsylvania Legal Awards (PALA) 2023

June 14, 2023
TBC, PA

The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.

Learn More

Consulting Top Consultants 2023

June 15, 2023
New York, NY

Consulting Magazine identifies consultants that have the biggest impact on their clients, firms and the profession.

Learn More

Southeastern Legal Awards (SLA) 2023

June 22, 2023
TBC

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.

Learn More

View Announcement ›

DAVIS, SAPERSTEIN & SALOMON, P.C.

05/08/2023
NJLJ Web

It is our privilege & honor to announce the addition of Steven H. Cohen, Patricia Z. Boguslawski, Evan D. Baker & Kelly A. Conlon as new partners of DAVIS, SAPERSTEIN & SALOMON, P.C.

View Announcement ›

FERRO LABELLA & WEISS LLC

05/08/2023
NJLJ Web

FERRO LABELLA & WEISS LLC would like to announce that....

View Announcement ›

Legal Newswire

CHAMBERS USA 2023 RANKS SOUTHBANK LEGAL AMONG THE TOP BANDS FOR COMMERCIAL LITI...

CHAMBERS USA 2023 RANKS IFRAH LAW AND FIRM PARTNERS AMONG THE TOP BANDS FOR GAMI...

Cartel Blue, Inc. Announces Nano-Enhanced THC Product

Intrepid Managed Discovery Welcomes Experienced Team to Drive eDiscovery

Submit a press release

Kugle v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.

Because "death penalty" sanctions were inappropriate for what the trial court perceived to be perjury by one of the plaintiffs and because the trial court did not consider lesser sanctions, the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the suit.

Thank you for sharing!

More From ALM

5 Ways to Use Technology and Innovative Staffing to Better Manage Workplace Legal Questions

Strategies to Make the Most of Your Document Review Team

Speed, Slack and Specialization: A Precision Approach to Second Requests

Premium Subscription

Team Accounts

Bundle Subscriptions

From Data to Decisions

Exclusive Depth and Reach.

Big Pictures and Fine Details

Pennsylvania Legal Awards (PALA) 2023

Consulting Top Consultants 2023

Southeastern Legal Awards (SLA) 2023

COMMERCIAL FINANCE ATTORNEY - CT OFFICES; REMOTE will be considered

Attorneys-Solicitor General Division

CIVIL LITIGATION ATTORNEY -NEW YORK

LAWYERS OF DISTINCTION

DAVIS, SAPERSTEIN & SALOMON, P.C.

FERRO LABELLA & WEISS LLC

Legal Newswire

Kugle v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.

Because "death penalty" sanctions were inappropriate for what the trial court perceived to be perjury by one of the plaintiffs and because the trial court did not consider lesser sanctions, the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the suit.

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Legal Newswire

Subscribe to Law.com