Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

Cancel

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Kitt v. United States

Dismissal of complaint affirmed; retroactive imposition of an additional tax on plaintiffs' early and non-qualified withdrawal from their Roth IRA did not offend due process because retroactivity was rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose and was limited in time; imposition of tax was not a punishment, so it did not violate the Excessive Fines Clause.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims Judge Diane G. Weinstein

For many years the Internal Revenue Code has provided that if the owner of an Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) withdraws all or part of it for an impermissible (non-retirement related) purpose or before reaching a certain age, there will be a ten percent tax on the withdrawal. In the summer of 1997 Congress created a second kind of IRA (effective January 1, 1998) — the so-called Roth IRA — and provided that ordinary IRAs could be “rolled over” into Roth IRAs. The form that the legislation took, however, meant that if funds from a regular IRA were rolled over into a Roth IRA and then immediately withdrawn, the ten percent tax would not apply. After Congress discovered this situation, in July 1998 it subjected such withdrawals to the ten percent tax, effective January 1, 1998 (the effective date of the basic legislation).

In the interval the appellant Mr. Kitt rolled over his regular IRA into a Roth IRA, and then withdrew most of the money in the latter for a non-permissible purpose and before reaching the specified age. Mr. and Mrs. Kitt challenged the application of the ten percent tax to the withdrawal as unconstitutional because it is: (1) a retroactive imposition of a penalty that denies them due process, in violation of the Fifth Amendment, (2) a taking of their property, for which they are entitled to just compensation under that amendment, and (3) the imposition of an excessive fine, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The United States Court of Federal Claims rejected these contentions. We affirm.

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Team Accounts
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Bundle Subscriptions
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center
General Counsel Conference Southwest 2024
September 18, 2024 - September 19, 2024
Dallas, TX

Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies


Learn More
Women, Influence & Power in Law US Awards 2024
September 24, 2024
Chicago, IL

Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) 2024
September 23, 2024 - September 25, 2024
Chicago, IL

WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts
Associate Attorney

Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...


Apply Now ›
Plaintiff Personal Injury Attorney

Javerbaum Wurgaft, a large civil litigation firm with nine (9) offices, seeks: Plaintiff Personal Injury Attorney for Northern New Jersey of...


Apply Now ›
Litigation Attorneys - Cheshire-CT

Exciting Career Opportunities at Nuzzo & Roberts! Nuzzo & Roberts, a leading mid-sized insurance defense firm based in Cheshire, CT...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs