Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

Cancel

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Kitt v. United States

Dismissal of complaint affirmed; retroactive imposition of an additional tax on plaintiffs' early and non-qualified withdrawal from their Roth IRA did not offend due process because retroactivity was rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose and was limited in time; imposition of tax was not a punishment, so it did not violate the Excessive Fines Clause.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims Judge Diane G. Weinstein

For many years the Internal Revenue Code has provided that if the owner of an Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) withdraws all or part of it for an impermissible (non-retirement related) purpose or before reaching a certain age, there will be a ten percent tax on the withdrawal. In the summer of 1997 Congress created a second kind of IRA (effective January 1, 1998) — the so-called Roth IRA — and provided that ordinary IRAs could be “rolled over” into Roth IRAs. The form that the legislation took, however, meant that if funds from a regular IRA were rolled over into a Roth IRA and then immediately withdrawn, the ten percent tax would not apply. After Congress discovered this situation, in July 1998 it subjected such withdrawals to the ten percent tax, effective January 1, 1998 (the effective date of the basic legislation).

In the interval the appellant Mr. Kitt rolled over his regular IRA into a Roth IRA, and then withdrew most of the money in the latter for a non-permissible purpose and before reaching the specified age. Mr. and Mrs. Kitt challenged the application of the ten percent tax to the withdrawal as unconstitutional because it is: (1) a retroactive imposition of a penalty that denies them due process, in violation of the Fifth Amendment, (2) a taking of their property, for which they are entitled to just compensation under that amendment, and (3) the imposition of an excessive fine, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The United States Court of Federal Claims rejected these contentions. We affirm.

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now

Team Accounts

Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now

Bundle Subscriptions

Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center

GlobeSt. Healthcare Real Estate 2023

December 11, 2023 - December 12, 2023
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More

Legalweek Leaders in Tech Law Awards 2024

January 29, 2024
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

Legalweek New York 2024

January 29, 2024 - February 01, 2024
New York, NY

Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts

Finance/Corporate Trust Lawyer - CT or Remote


We are seeking a lawyer with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowned C...


Apply Now ›

FINANCE & REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES - Connecticut Preferred; Remote will be considered


Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...


Apply Now ›

Labor and Employment Junior Associate


Duane Morris LLP seeks a highly motivated junior associate to join its dynamic and growing Labor and Employment Class Action group in Chicag...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs

Scura Wigfield Heyer Stevens & Cammarota, LLP

12/04/2023
New Jersey Law Journal

Scura Wigfield Heyer Stevens & Cammarota, LLP


View Announcement ›

Shapiro, Croland, Reiser, Apfel, & Di Iorio, LLP

11/20/2023
New Jersey Law Journal

ShapiroCroland Attorneys at Law Take Pleasure in Announcing that VALERIE A. VLADYKA HAS JOINED THE FIRM AS COUNSEL Valerie concentrates her practice in Insurance coverage, Commercial Litigation and Probate Matters 411 Hackensack Avenue, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Telephone: (201) 488-3900 | Telecopier: (201) 488-9481 |www.shapiro-croland.com November 2023


View Announcement ›

Rottenstreich Farley Bronstein Fisher Potter Hodas LLP

11/13/2023
Daily Business Review

Congratulations to our Partner Richard Segal on becoming Chairman of the Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce


View Announcement ›
Go to Professional Announcements

Legal Newswire

South Florida-Based Mediator/Arbitrator Michael Weiss Joins UWWM s Panel
Goranson Bain Ausley Promotes Three Family Lawyers to Partner Positions
Good2bSocial Announces Results from the 2023 Social Law Firm Index
ZeroRisk Cases Launches Game-Changing Lead Generation Service for Law Firms, Gua...
Submit a press release