In the extensive coverage of liability issues concerning potentially injurious Chinese-origin products, few commentators have focused on how entering into a treaty on enforcement in China of U.S. products liability judgments might offer added protection to U.S. consumers.

Under 19th-century precedent, Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113 (1895), the United States generally enforces without requiring reciprocity civil money-damages judgments from China and other countries. U.S. courts require only that the foreign court had proper jurisdiction over the defendant, gave the defendant adequate notice and afforded the defendant an opportunity to be heard in an impartial proceeding with fair procedures. In short, an injured Chinese consumer may, in principle, enforce in a U.S. court his Chinese judgment for money damages caused by defective products exported to China by a U.S. manufacturer.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]