New Jersey’s offer-of-judgment rule was created to spur settlements by making it risky for a litigant to reject a bona fide offer. But a recent ruling suggests the offer may work to the offerer’s detriment if the defense appeals.

In Jastram v. Kruse, A-0756-06, a two-judge panel ordered remittitur of a $500,000 automobile injury verdict to $50,000, based in part on their observation that the plaintiff made a $12,500 offer of judgment, “reflecting her assessment of a reasonable settlement.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]