Law students learn early that injunctive relief is an extraordinary remedy reserved for cases where monetary damages are inadequate. One of the first lessons trademark lawyers learn is that courts will presume irreparable injury, justifying an extraordinary remedy, when a plaintiff proves trademark infringement or establishes a likelihood of success on the merits of a trademark claim.

Alarmingly, this fundamental trademark assumption is now in jeopardy as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision last year in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange LLC.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]