Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

For 24 years, the most effective way to defend against a charge of willful infringement has been to rely on the “advice-of-counsel” defense; i.e., to assert that you consulted with, and relied upon, a competent opinion of counsel finding that there was no infringement of any valid claim of the patent at issue. Underwater Devices, Inc. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., 717 F.2d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (setting forth the duty-of-care standard).

The advice-of-counsel defense to willful infringement led to a harsh reality — an accused infringer had two choices: 1) produce a written opinion and waive the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product related to the subject matter of the opinion; or 2) not produce an opinion so as not to waive the privilege and work product, but be virtually defenseless to willful infringement, because no opinion is produced. Until three years ago, the choice not to waive the privilege or to forgo an opinion also subjected an accused infringer to an adverse inference that an opinion was unfavorable. See Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH v. Dana Corp., 383 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (en banc decision rejecting the adverse inference rule). The Federal Circuit’s ruling in Knorr-Bremse seemed to be an attempt to temper the harsh result of the duty-of-care standard. Interestingly, Judge Timothy B. Dyk, as the lone dissenter in Knorr-Bremse, called for eliminating the duty-of-care requirement as a factor in the willfulness and enhanced damages analysis, calling it a “relic of the past.” Id. at 1352.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.