In 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court issued Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White. At the time, some in-house lawyers worried that the high court’s decision to relax the standard for actionable retaliation under Title VII would lead to a significant change in 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals jurisprudence.

No significant changes have occurred. The 5th Circuit has read Burlington Northern in the most restrictive light possible and continues to affirm summary judgment on behalf of defendants frequently, despite the high court’s ruling.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]